Masterpiece Cards

Masterpiece Cards

250 famous paintings are reproduced and reviewed on 4" x 6" Cards (see a sample art history card). Covers Renaissance paintings through Pop, 500 years of art history.

Curious which paintings? Download our Famous Paintings ebook.  

Can you already tell Masterpiece Cards will elicit squeals of joy? Order Masterpiece Cards


Famous Paintings by Art Museum

What art paintings are must-see at certain art museums? Here's what art historians recommend most often in these landmark art museums:

Louvre, Paris: Famous-Artwork-The-Louvre

Metropolitan Museum of Art: Art-Paintings-to-See-at-the-Metropolitan-Museum

National Gallery, LondonArt-Paintings-to-See-at-the-National-Gallery

 

Become A Facebook Fan!

Masterpiece Cards on Facebook

Art History Blogs

Art Blog by Bob : not to be missed

ArtHistory.net: good biographical info about famous artists

Your Daily Art: an art history blog by Martha Lattie (a guest blogger here!)

Christine Miller’s Art History blog

Macvay AP Art History

Early Modern Art Blog :a new blog with an emphasis on 17th century Italy.

Famous Paintings Reviewed

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Famous Painters: Frans Hals and The Laughing Cavalier

 | Submit to Digg digg it | Submit to Reddit reddit | Add to delicious delicious | Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Share on Facebook Facebook | Share on Twitter Twitter 

The Golden Age of Dutch Art  in the 17th century was initiated and dominated by Frans Hals, Rembrandt van Rijn and Johannes Vermeer.  These famous painters worked, respectively, in Haarlem, Amsterdam and Delft; none ever traveled to Italy. 

Hals, born circa 1581, introduced a vitality and expressivenesss not previously seen in portraiture.  Of the 300 or so paintings he created, nearly all are portraits, typically of Haarlem citizens as individuals or in groups. Among his most famous artwork is The Laughing Cavalier, also called The Merry Cavalier

 famous paintings frans hals

Oil on canvas.  1624.  33 3/4" x 27".  The Wallace Collection, London.

Here, the courtly soldier epitomizes Baroque gallantry and seemingly flaunts his amorous tendencies - his sleeves are ornately decorated with bees of Cupid and Mercury's winged staff and hat.  The intricacy of the embroidery is juxtaposed by Hals' broad, energetic brushwork in the cavalier's black sash. As in most of Hals' portraits, a fleeting moment is captured with immediacy.

Fast forward three centuries to the 1920s, a time during which the three masters of the Dutch Golden Age were frequently imitated and forged.  Noted art historian Cornelis Hofstede de Groot had devoted himself to determining which 17th century Dutch paintings were authentic, and which were created by followers or forgers.  In 1924, he published a brief article titled, "Some Recently Discovered Works by Frans Hals", announcing his discovery of The Merry Cavalier.  De Groot proclaimed it an authentic Hals, after which the work was sold to an auction house.  Shortly thereafter, the auction house claimed it a forgery and demanded partial reimbursement of the purchase price.  Profoundly offended, De Groot stated that if he was wrong, he'd donate his personal (and sizeable) art collection to Holland's museums, further vowing "never to express another word, either in writing or verbally, about the genuineness of an unknown Frans Hals."

The subsequent trial provided incontrovertible proof that De Groot had erred -- although Hals died in 1666, the blue paint in the cavalier's coat was first available in 1826; another blue in the background was made in 1820, while the white in the collar was zinc white, only made after 1781.   Furthermore, the canvas was attached to its stretcher with modern, paint-splattered nails, meaning that they were positioned before the painter began. 

In spite of this data, De Groot was steadfast in his conviction that he'd found an authentic Hals.  Before the trial concluded and a verdict announced, De Groot - contending he was the victim of injustice - purchased Merry Cavalier for himself. The following year, he published a booklet entitled True or False? Eye or Chemistry?.  Here he stated that a connoisseur's eye was the best determination of artistic authenticity, adding that scientific analyses were beside the point. "A forger could scarcely imagine a more welcome message", notes Edward Dolnick in The Forger's Spell.

If you are engaged by the complexities of art forgery -- in the work themselves and in the mind of the forger -- I strongly recommend Dolnick's work, "a true story of Vermeer, Nazis and the greatest art hoax of the twentieth century". 

 


Comments

Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Receive email when someone replies.