Masterpiece Cards

Masterpiece Cards

250 famous paintings are reproduced and reviewed on 4" x 6" Cards (see a sample art history card). Covers Renaissance paintings through Pop, 500 years of art history.

Curious which paintings? Download our Famous Paintings ebook.  

Can you already tell Masterpiece Cards will elicit squeals of joy? Order Masterpiece Cards


Famous Paintings by Art Museum

What art paintings are must-see at certain art museums? Here's what art historians recommend most often in these landmark art museums:

Louvre, Paris: Famous-Artwork-The-Louvre

Metropolitan Museum of Art: Art-Paintings-to-See-at-the-Metropolitan-Museum

National Gallery, LondonArt-Paintings-to-See-at-the-National-Gallery

 

Become A Facebook Fan!

Masterpiece Cards on Facebook

Art History Blogs

Art Blog by Bob : not to be missed

ArtHistory.net: good biographical info about famous artists

Your Daily Art: an art history blog by Martha Lattie (a guest blogger here!)

Christine Miller’s Art History blog

Macvay AP Art History

Early Modern Art Blog :a new blog with an emphasis on 17th century Italy.

Famous Paintings Reviewed

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Famous Paintings: The Arnolfini Portrait

 | Submit to Digg digg it | Submit to Reddit reddit | Add to delicious delicious | Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Share on Facebook Facebook | Share on Twitter Twitter 

Among the most famous paintings of the Renaissance, The Arnolfini Portrait has been enigmatic since Jan van Eyck (ca. 1370/90 - 1441) painted it over 450 years ago. He left no documents to clarify its meaning, and little is known of his early life or training.  From court and legal documents, scholars have determined that van Eyck was retained in 1425 by Philip the Good, the duke of Burgundy (best known for having captured Joan of Arc).  Art historians generally attribute 25 artworks to van Eyck, while noting that signatures are rare on 15th century paintings. Instead, painters signed the frames which often became lost or

van eyck margaret the wife Right: Margaret, The Artist's Wife, 1439.  Oil on oak, 1439.  Approx. 13" x 10". On loan at National Gallery, London, from City Museums (Bruges)

replaced.  In the case of van Eyck's Renaissance paintings, at least two carry his signature: Man in a Red Turban, believed to be a self-portrait,  (below) and Margaret, The Artist's Wife (right).

 van eyck man in a red turban
Jan van Eyck.  Man in a Red Turban (Self Portrait?), 1433. Tempera and oil on wood.  13 1/8" x 10 1/8".  National Gallery, London.

In both cases, the original frame bears van Eyck's motto, "Als ik kan", or the pun, "As I or Eyck can". While The Arnolfini Portrait lacks its original frame, art historians agree that it's a van Eyck painting - but disagree about its intrepretation.


Above the concave mirror on the back wall, van Eyck has inscribed, "Johannes de eyck fuit hic 1934", which translates as "Jan van Eyck was here, 1434". Typically, though, a painting in 15th century Flanders would have been signed, "Jan van Eyck made this". 

jan van eyck arnolfini portrait
 
Jan van Eyck.  The Arnolfini Portrait, 1434.  Oil on wood.  32 1/4" x 23 1/2".  National Gallery, London.

The verbiage van Eyck used is what an eyewitness to a legal document would've used, fueling controversy about whether this is a wedding portrait of Giovanni Arnolfini and his wife, Giovanna Cenami, or a "power of attorney" painting in which the husband grants legal permission for his wife to act on his behalf during an absence. If this is a wedding portrait, we can safely surmise that Giovanni is 30 years old or younger: in 15th century Flanders, a marriage ultimatum was given to unmarried men who were thirty, with names of those who failed to marry recorded in the dreaded "Book of Disgrace".  

The German scholar Erwin Panofsy claimed in 1934 that this Renaissance painting was indeed a wedding portrait, with van Eyck seen in the mirror's reflection (below) and his signature verifying his presence.  Various features of The Arnolfini Portrait are associated with matrimony: the couple has removed their shoes in recognition of its sanctity, transforming the

 arnolfini portrait detail

Detail.  The Arnolfini Portrait.

bedchamber into a holy place. There are various references to the fertility sought in marriage: the bedpost finial is a wooden statue of Saint Margaret, the patron saint of childbirth, while the fruit on the windowsill and chest alludes to abundance. In keeping with the customs of the time, the woman's robe is cinched above her stomach, giving the appearance of pregnancy but intended to emphasize fertility.  While the dog is a rare breed (affenpinscher) indicating the couple's prosperity, it is a traditional symbol of fidelity (thanks to Gardner's Fred Kleiner for noting that the common dog name "Fido" comes from the Latin fido, to trust, the root of ‘fidelity). The ten roundels surrounding the mirror show the Passion of Christ, suggesting the Christian idea that the "eye of God" will watch the newlywed couple. 

Research by Lorne Campbell in 1998, however, contends that The Arnolfini Portrait is a double portrait and not a wedding picture. Campbell states that the wedding ceremony Panofsky cited in his argument occurred in 1447 -- four years after the painting was signed, and also six years after van Eyck's death. Barring newly discovered historical documents, The Arnolfini Portrait will remain enigmatic, with the intentions of the artist and patron unclear. 

Note: I was amused and amazed to learn that Margaret, The Artist's Wife, was considered a 33 year old beauty dressed in finery of the day -- her crimson gown lined with fur, and her fluted veil were signs of her prosperity.

Are you a fan of famous paintings and their histories? Read about Masterpiece Cards, art history cards that reproduce and examine famous paintings in Western art.  

 

 

 

 


Comments

Not «The Arnolfini Portrait» but «The Van Eyck Wedding» - News about a Critical Essay, proposing the painting is a self-portrait of the painter with his spouse Margaretha: On the paternity of this work and on the date there is no doubt, since we can see the signature, but there is no certainty of the two people represented. Crowe and Cavalcaselle in 1857 set the painting in relation to the inventory of the paintings owned by Margherita of Austria in 1516 were the following words were written “Ung grant tableau qu’on appelle Hernoul le Fin, avec sa femme dedens une chambre” Hernol le Fin was interpreted as a common form of the surname Arnolfini, and since then the depicted couple were identified as Giovanni Arnolfini, a rich merchant living in Bruges, advisor of the Duke of Burgundy and his wife Giovanna Cenami. 
 
 
 
Since 1847 the director of the National Gallery had timidly proposed that the painting may have represented Jan and Margaretha Van Eyck, but the most acclaimed art critics, like Ruskin and De Labourde were absolutely convinced of the Arnolfini thesis until 1934, when Panofsky closed the question by affirming that this was the truth since the painter married in 1433 and not in 1434. 
 
 
 
Marco Paoli returns on this question, confirming that there are no documents that put Van Eyck in relation to the Arnolfini family. In this situation there is no reference, even indirect, in the family tree of the supposed commissioners, nor to their land and their original cultural level; the couple also have no resemblance to the Mediterranean physical aspect. In conclusion, there is no other reason for the attribution except the fact that there is an assonance between Hernol le Fin and Arnolfini. 
 
http://www.loschermo.it/articolo.php?idart=25082 
 
Posted @ Monday, March 01, 2010 3:59 AM by Iac
Thanks for these insights into The Arnolfini Portrait -- and may the research continue to unravel its fascinating history!  
 
Susan Benford 
Posted @ Monday, March 01, 2010 10:15 AM by Susan Benford
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Receive email when someone replies.