What are the most controversial paintings in art history?
Valid opinions have to incorporate a key premise of art history– that works of art must be assessed within their historical, political, and social contexts. Otherwise, “controversial” makes little sense.
How so? Imagine 1884, the year John Singer Sargent completed one of his best paintings, Madame X.
This portrait of the society beauty, Madame Gautreau, reveals decolletage and initially showed her right strap off her shoulder. Tame by 2011 standards, but the Paris Salon of 1884 was mortified.
Gautreau’s family was aghast, and persuaded Sargent to repaint the offending strap into “on” position. (Read more about this and more famous paintings by Sargent).
As an additional reminder of context in art history… While Sargent complained that Gautreau’s beauty was so overwhelming she was “unpaintable”, a contemporary viewer might venture that the Madame sports a highly prominent, hooked, and rather unattractive nose, 19th century beauty or not.
So what does make controversial art? I venture it’s one (or a combination) of these factors:
Subject Matter: exemplified by Jasper Johns’ Three Flags, which some claimed desecrated the U. S. flag.
Technique and Materials Used: Jackson Pollock, for sure, but what about Albrecht Durer’s Self-Portrait (1500)? He rocked some boats by placing himself frontally, a stance used for the divine. (Read about other famous paintings by Durer).
Depiction of Political Situations: Antoine-Jean Gros’ Napoleon Bonaparte Visiting the Victims of the Plaque shows Napoleon munificently touching a plaque victim. When you know that Napoleon himself had poisoned these victims, it’s propaganda by any other name.
Attribution is Uncertain: when artwork is newly attributed to famous artists like Michelangelo, the art history world cleaves into believers and non-believers. Read more about the Met’s alleged Michelangelo painting,
Portrayal of Subject Matter: Although Madame X is a portrait – hardly a controversial genre – Sargent’s take on this genre was taboo. Here are some other paintings with an unorthodox presentation of subject matter:
- Edouard Manet and Olympia (1863). Initially reminiscent of Titian’s Venus of Urbino (1538), Olympia is actually the
opposite of Venus: the latter is plump and round, gazes adoringly at the (male) viewer, and relaxes with her obedient, sleeping dog.
- Manet’s lean Olympia, like her hissing black cat, looks menacingly toward her audience. As Marilyn Stokstad notes, “…Manet in effect subverted the entire traditon of the accomodating female nude”.
Suffice it to say that critics despised Olympia at the 1865 Paris Salon.
- Thomas Eakins and The Gross Clinic (1875). Although Realism was prevalent in the late 19th century, critics contended that The Gross Clinic was too realistic Realism.
- Pablo Picasso and Les Demoiselles (1907): There’s nothing novel in art history about paintings of courtesans or harlots, except when their faces are portrayed as African masks, with body parts virtually indistinguishable from backgrounds, thereby challenging the very ideal of beauty in art history.
Chuck Close and Big Self-Portrait (1967-68). Close took Picasso one step farther: classical, ideal beauty is no longer the domain of portraiture, which should instead acknowledge that the face of Everyman merited artistic consideration
Want to discover more about famous paintings?
Explore Masterpiece Cards, art history flash cards about some of the most famous paintings in the world. Covering Renaissance paintings through Pop Art paintings, these 250 works are reproduced and reviewed on this set of art history flash cards.
- Explore the Famous Paintings ebook, a sortable listing of all 250 art paintings in Masterpiece Cards, and
- See sample art history Masterpiece Cards.
Questions? Send them to info (at) TheMasterpieceCards.com.